Pitt. v. Swearingen

76 Ill. 250
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 Ill. 250 (Pitt. v. Swearingen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitt. v. Swearingen, 76 Ill. 250 (Ill. 1875).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The sixth section of the “Act to amend chapter 43, of the Revised Statutes of 1845, entitled ‘Forcible Entry and Detainer/ ” in force February 16, 1865, does not repeal so much of the statute amended as requires, in cases of appeals in forcible entry and detainer, that the bond shall contain a clause conditioned for the payment of all rents becoming due, etc., but simply contains additional guaranties, to be observed by the defendant appealing, for the benefit of the plaintiff.

The bond in suit in the present case contains no clause providing for the payment of rent, as required by that statute, nor can it, by legal implication, be held to embrace rents.

The judgment of the court below is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Truly Warner Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.
259 Ill. App. 485 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1931)
Pierson v. Lawyer
225 Ill. App. 400 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ill. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitt-v-swearingen-ill-1875.