Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Pitt v. Sunderland

Pitt v. Sunderland

642 P.2d 703, 56 Or. App. 751, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2843
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 5, 1982
DocketNo. 16-81-06435, CA A22089
StatusPublished

This text of 642 P.2d 703 (Pitt v. Sunderland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitt v. Sunderland, 642 P.2d 703, 56 Or. App. 751, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2843 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding sustaining a demurrer1 to his replication to the return to the writ. The order appealed from provides: “It is ordered that the demurrer be sustained, with plaintiff being allowed to plead further.” An order sustaining a demurrer is not appealable. J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton, 287 Or 709, 601 P2d 1254 (1979). No order dismissing plaintiffs petition has been entered. See Scott v. Cupp, 55 Or App 23, 637 P2d 173 (1981).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton
601 P.2d 1254 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
Holland v. Gladden
368 P.2d 331 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)
Scott v. Cupp
637 P.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 P.2d 703, 56 Or. App. 751, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitt-v-sunderland-orctapp-1982.