Pitt v. Sunderland
642 P.2d 703, 56 Or. App. 751, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2843
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding sustaining a demurrer1 to his replication to the return to the writ. The order appealed from provides: “It is ordered that the demurrer be sustained, with plaintiff being allowed to plead further.” An order sustaining a demurrer is not appealable. J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton, 287 Or 709, 601 P2d 1254 (1979). No order dismissing plaintiffs petition has been entered. See Scott v. Cupp, 55 Or App 23, 637 P2d 173 (1981).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pitt v. Sunderland, 642 P.2d 703, 56 Or. App. 751, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2843 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
642 P.2d 703 (Pitt v. Sunderland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton
601 P.2d 1254 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
Holland v. Gladden
368 P.2d 331 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)
Scott v. Cupp
637 P.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)