Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.

264 A.D. 830, 35 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4888

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1942·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and denial of the motion on the ground that the complaint read in the light of the affidavits presented on the motion may be construed as alleging a cause of action. (Mnich v. American Radiator Company, 263 App. Div. 573.) (The judgment dismisses plaintiff’s complaint on motion of the defendant in a silicosis action. The order is the order of dismissal.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and denial of the motion on the ground that the complaint read in the light of the affidavits presented on the motion may be construed as alleging a cause of action. (Mnich v. American Radiator Company, 263 App. Div. 573.) (The judgment dismisses plaintiff’s complaint on motion of the defendant in a silicosis action. The order is the order of dismissal.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc., 264 A.D. 830, 35 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 830 (Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related