Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.
This text of 264 A.D. 830 (Pitrowski v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and denial of the motion on the ground that the complaint read in the light of the affidavits presented on the motion may be construed as alleging a cause of action. (Mnich v. American Radiator Company, 263 App. Div. 573.) (The judgment dismisses plaintiff’s complaint on motion of the defendant in a silicosis action. The order is the order of dismissal.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 830, 35 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitrowski-v-hetzler-foundries-inc-nyappdiv-1942.