Pitonack v. State

572 So. 2d 1041, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 402, 1991 WL 4321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 23, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1109
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 So. 2d 1041 (Pitonack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitonack v. State, 572 So. 2d 1041, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 402, 1991 WL 4321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the imposition of costs in the sentence and remand so that the trial judge may either strike the costs or conduct a hearing to impose costs. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We also reverse the imposition of public defender fees as this record does not reflect notice and the opportunity to be heard prior to imposition. Therefore, Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1989) is not controlling. We decline to again certify the question already certified in Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

STONE, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hope v. State
588 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 1041, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 402, 1991 WL 4321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitonack-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.