Pitney v. Bugbee
120 A. 927, 98 N.J.L. 892, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pitney v. Bugbee. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 N.J.L. 116 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, -for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court touching the imposition of a transfer tax upon the bequest to the Newr Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
For affirmance — The Chancellor,. Ci-iiee Justice, SWAYZE, TRENCHAED, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTURN, WHITE, Heppeni-ieimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pitney v. Bugbee, 120 A. 927, 98 N.J.L. 892, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 302 (N.J. 1923).
120 A. 927 (Pitney v. Bugbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.