Pitner v. Federal Land Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pitner v. Federal Land Bank

161 S.E. 852, 44 Ga. App. 377, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 734

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

Docket21876

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 852 (Pitner v. Federal Land Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitner v. Federal Land Bank, 161 S.E. 852, 44 Ga. App. 377, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 734 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, and the two special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

2. The provisions of the act of August 21, 1922 (Ga. L. 1922, p. 114), declaring that growing crops shall be personalty, are not applicable to this case. See, in this connection, Schnedl v. Langford, 40 Ga. App. 190 (149 S. E. 102).

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of Ulness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI