Pitkin v. Olmstead

1 Root 217
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1790
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 217 (Pitkin v. Olmstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitkin v. Olmstead, 1 Root 217 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Opinion

By the Court.

The river being a public navigable river, it is free for all the citizens, to navigate their vessels in and to draw seines for the purpose of taking fish — that the bed of the river is the private property of no one, but remains as public as the waters that flow in it — whoever therefore by labor and expense, clears a fish-place in its bed, acquires a right to occupy and enjoy it, in preference to any other; and by a long-continued possession and occupation, in the proper seasons, the right is strengthened and confirmed; and the defendants had no right to disturb or interrupt the plaintiffs in the exercise of their light in their own proper fishing-place, so long as they did not go upon their land.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nies v. Connecticut River Bridge & Highway District
132 A. 873 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1926)
Moor v. Veazie
32 Me. 343 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitkin-v-olmstead-connsuperct-1790.