Pitkin v. Olmstead

1 Root 217
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The river being a public navigable river, it is free for all the citizens, to navigate their vessels in and to draw seines for the purpose of taking fish — that the bed of the river is the private property of no one, but remains as public as the waters that flow in it — whoever therefore by labor and expense, clears a fish-place in its bed, acquires a right to occupy and enjoy it, in preference to any other; and by a long-continued possession and occupation, in the proper seasons, the right is strengthened and confirmed; and the defendants had no right to disturb or interrupt the plaintiffs in the exercise of their light in their own proper fishing-place, so long as they did not go upon their land.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitkin v. Olmstead, 1 Root 217 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 217 (Pitkin v. Olmstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nies v. Connecticut River Bridge & Highway District
132 A. 873 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1926)
Moor v. Veazie
32 Me. 343 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1850)