Pitkin v. Munsell

97 A. 657, 90 Vt. 268, 1916 Vt. LEXIS 272
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided May 6, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Watson, J.

The plaintiff moved for a close jail certificate. At the time of rendering judgment on the verdict, the court found that the defendant, at the time of the injury complained of, was a boy thirteen years of age, "too young to fully comprehend, in the judgment of the court, the consequences of his act;” that his riding on the sidewalk, and his act or neglect which caused the injury, "was (were) wilful, but the injury was accidental and without malice. ’ ’ The court did not adjudge in connection therewith "that the defendant ought to be confined in close jail,” without which no certificate could be granted. P. S. 2106; In re Wheelock, 13 Vt. 375.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitkin v. Munsell, 97 A. 657, 90 Vt. 268, 1916 Vt. LEXIS 272 (Vt. 1916).

97 A. 657 (Pitkin v. Munsell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vermont Evaporator Co. v. Taft
184 A. 704 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1936)
Lyon v. Prescott
156 A. 679 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1931)
Wellman v. Mead
107 A. 396 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1919)