Pitchford v. State

780 So. 2d 1032, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 2001 WL 309418
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 2001·No. No. 1D00-949·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Hayes v. State, 780 So.2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Peterson v. [1033]*1033State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitchford v. State, 780 So. 2d 1032, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 2001 WL 309418 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

780 So. 2d 1032 (Pitchford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
767 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Peterson v. State
775 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hall v. State
773 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Hayes v. State
780 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)