Pitchford v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

504 F. App'x 549
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 8, 2013
Docket12-3553
StatusUnpublished

This text of 504 F. App'x 549 (Pitchford v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitchford v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 504 F. App'x 549 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 complaint. After careful review, we conclude that the dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gometz v. Culwell, 850 F.2d 461, 464 (8th Cir.1988) (to state § 1985(2) claim, plaintiff must allege with sufficient particularity that parties reached some agreement and conspired together to deprive plaintiff of federal right); Harrison v. Springdale Water & Sewer Comm’n, 780 F.2d 1422, 1430 (8th Cir.1986) (equal protection provision of § 1985(3) requires allegation of class-based animus). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randy Karl Gometz v. Wilson E. Culwell
850 F.2d 461 (Eighth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
504 F. App'x 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitchford-v-equal-employment-opportunity-commission-ca8-2013.