Pitchford v. City of Earle

Eighth Circuit

Pitchford v. City of Earle

320 F. App'x 477

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 8, 2009

DocketNo. 07-3747

StatusPublished

This text of 320 F. App'x 477 (Pitchford v. City of Earle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitchford v. City of Earle, 320 F. App'x 477 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil-rights action against the City of Earle, Arkansas, and some of its officials. After careful review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil-rights action against the City of Earle, Arkansas, and some of its officials. After careful review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

320 F. App'x 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitchford-v-city-of-earle-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack