Pitchford v. City of Earle

Eighth Circuit

Pitchford v. City of Earle

320 F. App'x 477

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2009·No. No. 07-3747·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil-rights action against the City of Earle, Arkansas, and some of its officials. After careful review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil-rights action against the City of Earle, Arkansas, and some of its officials. After careful review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Pitchford v. City of Earle, 320 F. App'x 477 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

320 F. App'x 477 (Pitchford v. City of Earle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related