Pitcher v. Douglas

37 Mich. 339, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 261
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 16, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 Mich. 339 (Pitcher v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitcher v. Douglas, 37 Mich. 339, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 261 (Mich. 1877).

Opinion

Marston, J.

Under the terms of the will of Zina Pitcher, deceased, the relief sought for in this case cannot be obtained.

Emily L. Pitcher was clearly given a life estate in lots six and seven, and as such was entitled to the possession and rents, issues and profits thereof, while other portions of the estate were expressly charged with the encumbrance thereon and with, keeping the dwelling thereon insured and in good order. The executors were given full power, without the consent of any other person, to sell and convey these lots, and invest the proceeds thereof on bond and mortgage, and the interest thereon, without any abatement whatever, was to be paid to Mrs. Pitcher. In reference to requiring the executors to file an account, this is not the proper court to institute proceedings in for such a purpose. The probate court has full power and authority in the premises.

The decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Natalie Olson v. Cecelia Bosanac
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Mich. 339, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitcher-v-douglas-mich-1877.