Pitcher v. Douglas

37 Mich. 339, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 261
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marston, J.

Under the terms of the will of Zina Pitcher, deceased, the relief sought for in this case cannot be obtained.

Emily L. Pitcher was clearly given a life estate in lots six and seven, and as such was entitled to the possession and rents, issues and profits thereof, while other portions of the estate were expressly charged with the encumbrance thereon and with, keeping the dwelling thereon insured and in good order. The executors were given full power, without the consent of any other person, to sell and convey these lots, and invest the proceeds thereof on bond and mortgage, and the interest thereon, without any abatement whatever, was to be paid to Mrs. Pitcher. In reference to requiring the executors to file an account, this is not the proper court to institute proceedings in for such a purpose. The probate court has full power and authority in the premises.

The decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitcher v. Douglas, 37 Mich. 339, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 261 (Mich. 1877).

37 Mich. 339 (Pitcher v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Natalie Olson v. Cecelia Bosanac
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018