Pitcher v. Clark

2 Wend. 631
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 631 (Pitcher v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pitcher v. Clark, 2 Wend. 631 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

By the Court, Marcy, J.

The notice being served on the agent, the service should regularly have been twenty-eight days. The only inquiry is, whether the service on the agent is regular. It is immaterial when the notice came to the hands of the attorney ; knowing that the service was insufficient on his agent, he had a right to avail himself of the defect in the service. The inquest must therefore be set aside, but without costs, for the reason that much irrelevant matter is incorporated in the affidavit on which the motion is founded. ■ The court will not require the taxing officer to dissect ' affidavits to determine what is pertinent; but whenever they are loaded with matter unnecessary to the correct determination of the question, and manifestly with a view of increasing costs against the opposite party, the court will invariably refuse to allow any .costs whatever of the motion, though it be successful.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballou v. Smith
31 N.H. 413 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1855)
People ex rel. Union Bank v. New York C. P.
19 Wend. 113 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)
Platt v. Torrey
18 Wend. 301 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pitcher-v-clark-nysupct-1829.