Pitcher v. Albi Mercantile Co.

60 Colo. 289
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 15, 1915·No. No. 8347·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per curiam:

(En banc).

Except as the ordinance of the City and County of Denver, No. 223, Series of 1913, may inhibit the issuance of a license to keep a saloon within a specified distance of designated places, the Excise Commissioner is invested with a sound judicial discretion, to be exercised in view of all the facts and circumstances of each particular case, as to granting or refusing a license to keep a saloon, and such discretion will not be interfered with unless it appears it has been abused. Muller v. Commissioners, 89 N. C. 171; Harrison v. The People, 222 Ill. 150, 78 N. E. 52; Swift v. The People, 63 Ill. App. 453; Batters v. Dunn, 49 Conn. 479; Black on Intoxicating Liquors, sec. 170, 23 Cyc. 135. It does not appear from the facts upon which the commissioner acted that he abused his discretion.

[290]*290The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause, remanded with directions to dismiss the proceeding.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

White, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pitcher v. Albi Mercantile Co., 60 Colo. 289 (Colo. 1915).

60 Colo. 289 (Pitcher v. Albi Mercantile Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van DeVegt v. Board of County Commissioners
55 P.2d 703 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1936)