Pistorino & Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 410
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pistorino & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Cust. Ct. 384
United States Customs Court·Decided November 19, 1959·No. No. 63528; protests 919843-G, 926681-G, and 941119-G (Boston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pistorino & Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 410 (cusc 1959).

43 Cust. Ct. 410 (Pistorino & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)