Pistorino & Co. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 481
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pistorino & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Cust. Ct. 384 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 14, 1956·No. No. 60043; protests 175975-K, etc. (Boston)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Angora rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of W. N. Proctor Company v. United States (35 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pistorino & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 481 (cusc 1956).
36 Cust. Ct. 481 (Pistorino & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. N. Proctor Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 89 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)