Piskorz v. Piskorz

81 A.D.3d 1354, 916 N.Y.S.2d 572
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 A.D.3d 1354 (Piskorz v. Piskorz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piskorz v. Piskorz, 81 A.D.3d 1354, 916 N.Y.S.2d 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice M. Rosa, J.), entered March 9, 2010, which granted defendant’s motion to enter a stipulated qualified domestic relations order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On this appeal by plaintiff from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we note that no appeal lies as of right from such an order (see Irato v Irato, 288 AD2d 952 [2001]). Nevertheless, inasmuch as plaintiff “raised timely objections prior to the entry of the QDRO and thereby preserved a record for our review,” we treat the notice of appeal as an application for leave to appeal and grant the application (id. at 952). Upon considering the merits of plaintiffs contention, we affirm the order. Present — Centra, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gay v. Gay
171 N.Y.S.3d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.3d 1354, 916 N.Y.S.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piskorz-v-piskorz-nyappdiv-2011.