Piskanin, M. v. Banach, K.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MICHAEL J. PISKANIN, : No. 144 MM 2016 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
KELLY L. BANACH JUDGE OF THE : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS AND : INDIVIDUAL, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Motion for Supervisory Action,” treated as a
Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and the Motion for Sanctions are DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Piskanin, M. v. Banach, K., (Pa. 2016).
Piskanin, M. v. Banach, K. (Piskanin, M. v. Banach, K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.