Piscitell v. Caccamo
278 A.D. 890, 104 N.Y.S.2d 905
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 278 A.D. 890 (Piscitell v. Caccamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Piscitell v. Caccamo, 278 A.D. 890, 104 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Lien Law, § 12-a, and Matter of Thomas J. Dorsey, Inc., 240 App. Div. 1005.) All concur. (Appeal from an order amending a notice of lien nztnc pro tunc so as to change the description of certain real property.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Yaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fremar Building Corp. v. Sand
104 A.D.2d 1025 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Marshall Construction Co. v. Brookdale Hospital Center
68 Misc. 2d 20 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Perrin v. Stempinski Realty Corp.
15 A.D.2d 48 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
In re Heidi Construction Corp.
20 Misc. 2d 58 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 890, 104 N.Y.S.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piscitell-v-caccamo-nyappdiv-1951.