Piscitell v. Caccamo
278 A.D. 890, 104 N.Y.S.2d 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1951·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Lien Law, § 12-a, and Matter of Thomas J. Dorsey, Inc., 240 App. Div. 1005.) All concur. (Appeal from an order amending a notice of lien nztnc pro tunc so as to change the description of certain real property.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Yaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Piscitell v. Caccamo, 278 A.D. 890, 104 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
278 A.D. 890 (Piscitell v. Caccamo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fremar Building Corp. v. Sand
104 A.D.2d 1025 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Marshall Construction Co. v. Brookdale Hospital Center
68 Misc. 2d 20 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Perrin v. Stempinski Realty Corp.
15 A.D.2d 48 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
In re Heidi Construction Corp.
20 Misc. 2d 58 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)