Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pisciotta v. City of New York

Pisciotta v. City of New York

275 A.D.2d 966
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 27, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 966 (Pisciotta v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pisciotta v. City of New York, 275 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

The receipt, without protest, of the salary paid is a complete bar to this action. (Administrative Code of the City of New York, § 93e-2.0; Quayle v. City of New York, 278 N. Y. 19; Gendel v. City of New York, 297 N. Y. 933.) In any event a new trial would be granted because, in our opinion, the finding of coercion, particularly with respect to the failure to sign the payroll receipts under protest, is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gendel v. City of New York
79 N.E.2d 820 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Quayle v. City of New York
14 N.E.2d 835 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pisciotta-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1949.