Pisarski v. State
471 So. 2d 679, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1632, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14840
This text of 471 So. 2d 679 (Pisarski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pisarski v. State, 471 So. 2d 679, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1632, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
Opinion
Because the trial judge based Pisarski’s sentence on guidelines not legally in effect at the time the offense was committed, we vacate the sentence. The cause is remanded for resentencing under the proper guidelines. Sueiro v. State, 471 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Taft v. State, 468 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sueiro v. State
471 So. 2d 1317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Taft v. State
468 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
471 So. 2d 679, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1632, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pisarski-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.