Pisarski v. Hunter

Indiana Supreme Court

Pisarski v. Hunter

120 N.E. 27, 187 Ind. 726, 1918 Ind. LEXIS 92

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 28, 1918

DocketNo. 23,442

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 N.E. 27 (Pisarski v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pisarski v. Hunter, 120 N.E. 27, 187 Ind. 726, 1918 Ind. LEXIS 92 (Ind. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Townsend, J.

— Appellant, a licensed saloon keeper, sought to enjoin appellee, prosecuting attorney for Lake county, from enforcing the Prohibition Law (Acts 1917 p. .15). Appellee’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained.

The validity of the act, under the state and federal Constitutions, is brought in question.

The points presented having been determined in the case of Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Company (1918), ante 623, 120 N. E. 19, 23, at this term, the judgment is affirmed.

Spencer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI