Pisano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Pisano v. State

554 So. 2d 1165, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 30, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 87, 1990 WL 3847

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 11, 1990·No. No. 74045·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted Pisano v. State, 539 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), based on apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We accepted Pisano v. State, 539 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), based on apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Pisano v. State, 554 So. 2d 1165, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 30, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 87, 1990 WL 3847 (Fla. 1990).

Pincite

554 So. 2d 1165 (Pisano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related