Pirtle v. State
895 S.W.2d 640, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 639, 1995 WL 128512
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the action of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pirtle v. State, 895 S.W.2d 640, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 639, 1995 WL 128512 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
895 S.W.2d 640 (Pirtle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.