Pirtle v. State

303 So. 2d 89
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1974·No. No. 74-352·Published

Opinion

GRIMES, Judge.

One of appellant’s points on appeal is identical to the point raised in Hall v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 303 So.2d 417. In Hall, supra, we certified the question to our Supreme Court as a matter of great public interest.

We, therefore, certify in the case sub ju-dice the same question as was certified in Hall, supra.

The other point on appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., concurs. BOARDMAN, J., concurs only to the extent of certifying the question to the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pirtle v. State, 303 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

303 So. 2d 89 (Pirtle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
303 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)