Pirtle v. Gray

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pirtle v. Gray

202 Ill. App. 601, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 1015

DecidedNovember 13, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 601 (Pirtle v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pirtle v. Gray, 202 Ill. App. 601, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 1015 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. AppeaXi Aim ebbob, § 365*—when objection to testimony may not be made. Testimony heard on the trial of a case without objection cannot be objected to on appeal, although the objection may not be without merit. 4. Damages, § 191*—when amount of for injury to property is for jury. It is for the jury to determine from all the evidence, under the instructions, what was the proper amount to be paid, in a suit for damages, for injury to property, and where the evidence covered a wide range, and, had the jury followed some of the witnesses, the damages might have been fixed as high as eight hundred dollars, a finding of five hundred dollars was not excessive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. AppeaXi Aim ebbob, § 365*—when objection to testimony may not be made. Testimony heard on the trial of a case without objection cannot be objected to on appeal, although the objection may not be without merit. 4. Damages, § 191*—when amount of for injury to property is for jury. It is for the jury to determine from all the evidence, under the instructions, what was the proper amount to be paid, in a suit for damages, for injury to property, and where the evidence covered a wide range, and, had the jury followed some of the witnesses, the damages might have been fixed as high as eight hundred dollars, a finding of five hundred dollars was not excessive.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 601, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirtle-v-gray-illappct-1916.