Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms

450 F. App'x 616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 F.3d 1015
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2011·No. 07-16097·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

On remand from the Supreme Court, California state prisoner John Pirtle renews his argument that the California Parole Board’s 2002 denial of his parole vio *617 lated his federal right to due process. In light of Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam), we hold that Pirtle’s right to due process was not violated. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s judgment granting the writ of habeas corpus.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms, 450 F. App'x 616 (9th Cir. 2011).

450 F. App'x 616 (Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swarthout v. Cooke
178 L. Ed. 2d 732 (Supreme Court, 2011)