Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
On remand from the Supreme Court, California state prisoner John Pirtle renews his argument that the California Parole Board’s 2002 denial of his parole vio *617 lated his federal right to due process. In light of Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam), we hold that Pirtle’s right to due process was not violated. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s judgment granting the writ of habeas corpus.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
450 F. App'x 616 (Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.