Pirsson v. Arkenburgh

27 Jones & S. 574, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 574

Opinion

The questions involved were as to the admissibility of parol testimony to add to or vary the terms of a written contract, and also as to the construction of the written contract. The Court affirmed the judgment and order with costs. (Freedman, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Ingraham, J., concurring,) and referring to a former decision in the case reported in 57 N. Y. Super. Ct. Rep. 474.