Pirro v. Cirigliano

673 N.E.2d 1238, 88 N.Y.2d 1033, 651 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 5010
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 10, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 1238 (Pirro v. Cirigliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pirro v. Cirigliano, 673 N.E.2d 1238, 88 N.Y.2d 1033, 651 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 5010 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (226 AD2d 465).

[1035]*1035Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 N.E.2d 1238, 88 N.Y.2d 1033, 651 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 5010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirro-v-cirigliano-ny-1996.