Pirozzi v. City of New York

117 F.3d 722, 1997 WL 424454
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 1997
DocketNo. 1773, Docket 96-9689
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 F.3d 722 (Pirozzi v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pirozzi v. City of New York, 117 F.3d 722, 1997 WL 424454 (2d Cir. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Pirozzi and Frank Rotundi appeal from Judge Scheindlin’s adverse grant of summary judgment in their action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellants, New York City Police Officers, allege that the release of their testimony before the New York City Police Department Civilian Complaint Review Board to the Kings County District Attorney violated both their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination and their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pirozzi v. City of New York, 950 F.Supp. 90 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pirozzi v. The City Of New York
117 F.3d 722 (Second Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 F.3d 722, 1997 WL 424454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirozzi-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-1997.