Pirone v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pirone v. Castro

82 A.D.3d 431, 917 N.Y.2d 860

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[432] Defendants met their burden of showing that the requested records relating to plaintiffs hepatitis are relevant to a physical condition that plaintiff placed “in controversy” through his deposition testimony (Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278, 287 [1989]). Furthermore, the records relating to plaintiffs depression were relevant. Plaintiff alleged that because of defendants’ conduct, he suffered physical injuries that has resulted in him spending “everyday or at least part of everyday from the date of the accident confined to his bed and home” (see id.). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[432] Defendants met their burden of showing that the requested records relating to plaintiffs hepatitis are relevant to a physical condition that plaintiff placed “in controversy” through his deposition testimony (Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278, 287 [1989]). Furthermore, the records relating to plaintiffs depression were relevant. Plaintiff alleged that because of defendants’ conduct, he suffered physical injuries that has resulted in him spending “everyday or at least part of everyday from the date of the accident confined to his bed and home” (see id.). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Pirone v. Castro, 82 A.D.3d 431, 917 N.Y.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

82 A.D.3d 431 (Pirone v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related