Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
247 A.2d 667, 53 N.J. 7, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 199
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 456.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN - 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co., 247 A.2d 667, 53 N.J. 7, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1968).
247 A.2d 667 (Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dawson v. Bunker Hill Plaza Associates
673 A.2d 847 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors
625 A.2d 1110 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
O'Keefe v. Sprout-Bauer, Inc.
970 F.2d 1244 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Sanna v. National Sponge Co.
506 A.2d 1258 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Izhaky v. Jamesway Corp.
478 A.2d 416 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Doloughty v. Blanchard Const. Co.
352 A.2d 613 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Vadala v. Anchor Hocking Corp.
346 A.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1975)
Steward v. ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY
268 A.2d 529 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Gallas v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
256 A.2d 289 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Rodrigues v. Elizabethtown Gas Co.
250 A.2d 408 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)