Piro v. Macura

976 N.E.2d 238, 19 N.Y.3d 1015, 951 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2012 NY Slip Op 83592, 2012 WL 3930807, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 2104
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 11, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 976 N.E.2d 238 (Piro v. Macura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Piro v. Macura, 976 N.E.2d 238, 19 N.Y.3d 1015, 951 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2012 NY Slip Op 83592, 2012 WL 3930807, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 2104 (N.Y. 2012).

Opinion

Motion by Physicians’ Reciprocal Insurer et al., insofar as it seeks leave to file a brief amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein, granted and the brief is accepted as filed; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein, dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 N.E.2d 238, 19 N.Y.3d 1015, 951 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2012 NY Slip Op 83592, 2012 WL 3930807, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piro-v-macura-ny-2012.