Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

171 Misc. 2, 11 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 21, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the order appealed from is a mere ruling of the trial court it is not appealable. (Kramer v. United States F. & G. Co., 212 App. Div. 644.) Subdivision 7 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code, providing for appeal by permission from any other order than those specifically appealable under said section, does not warrant an appeal by permission from a mere ruling on the trial.

Appeal dismissed and cause remitted to the court below for trial.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 171 Misc. 2, 11 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

171 Misc. 2 (Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fine v. Cummins
260 A.D. 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)