Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

171 Misc. 2, 11 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 21, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 Misc. 2 (Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 171 Misc. 2, 11 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the order appealed from is a mere ruling of the trial court it is not appealable. (Kramer v. United States F. & G. Co., 212 App. Div. 644.) Subdivision 7 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code, providing for appeal by permission from “ any other order ” than those specifically appealable under said section, does not warrant an appeal by permission from a mere ruling on the trial.

Appeal dismissed and cause remitted to the court below for trial.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fine v. Cummins
260 A.D. 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 Misc. 2, 11 N.Y.S.2d 716, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirkner-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappterm-1939.