Pirk v. Pirk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pirk v. Pirk

277 A.D.2d 1011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1011 (Pirk v. Pirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pirk v. Pirk, 277 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order (1) modifying a decree of divorce between the parties so as to grant to the appellant rights of visitation upon his seven-year-old infant son, in the custody of respondent under the provisions of the decree; (2) modifying the decree [1012]*1012by directing that appellant shall pay monthly to respondent an amount equal to the amount required to be paid by respondent upon the mortgage upon real property owned by both parties, and (3) directing appellant to pay respondent $50 counsel fees, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order (1) modifying a decree of divorce between the parties so as to grant to the appellant rights of visitation upon his seven-year-old infant son, in the custody of respondent under the provisions of the decree; (2) modifying the decree [1012]*1012by directing that appellant shall pay monthly to respondent an amount equal to the amount required to be paid by respondent upon the mortgage upon real property owned by both parties, and (3) directing appellant to pay respondent $50 counsel fees, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirk-v-pirk-nyappdiv-1950.