Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
This text of 865 N.W.2d 35 (Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether: (1) the determination of reasonable attorney fees under MCL 500.3148(1) is governed by Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519 (2008), and/or Wood v DAIIE, 413 Mich 573 (1982), and (2) the Oakland Circuit Court abused its discretion in [861]*861calculating the attorney fees due the plaintiff. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
865 N.W.2d 35, 498 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirgu-v-united-services-automobile-assn-mich-2015.