Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
865 N.W.2d 35, 498 Mich. 860
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 2015·No. No. 150834; Court of Appeals No. 314523·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether: (1) the determination of reasonable attorney fees under MCL 500.3148(1) is governed by Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519 (2008), and/or Wood v DAIIE, 413 Mich 573 (1982), and (2) the Oakland Circuit Court abused its discretion in [861] calculating the attorney fees due the plaintiff. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 865 N.W.2d 35, 498 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2015).
865 N.W.2d 35 (Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Association
884 N.W.2d 257 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2016)
De Etta Gardner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment Association
850 N.W.2d 403 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2014)