Pirela v. Miranda

680 F. App'x 248
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2017·No. No. 16-2356·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Pirela appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous. Pirela previously filed an untimely notice of appeal from this same district court order, which we dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. He now has filed a second notice of appeal. The second notice of appeal is similarly untimely. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pirela v. Miranda, 680 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2017).

680 F. App'x 248 (Pirela v. Miranda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related