Pirela v. Miranda
This text of 680 F. App'x 248 (Pirela v. Miranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Joseph Pirela appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous. Pirela previously filed an untimely notice of appeal from this same district court order, which we dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. He now has filed a second notice of appeal. The second notice of appeal is similarly untimely. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
680 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirela-v-miranda-ca4-2017.