Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pirant v. State

Pirant v. State

790 So. 2d 1187, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10278, 2001 WL 830056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-2127
StatusPublished

This text of 790 So. 2d 1187 (Pirant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pirant v. State, 790 So. 2d 1187, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10278, 2001 WL 830056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Robert Pirant appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell and possession of cannabis. Trial counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress and the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. Therefore, we do not decide the merit of these issues. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76-77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pendarvis v. State
752 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 So. 2d 1187, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10278, 2001 WL 830056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pirant-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.