Pippin v. Sheffield

137 S.E.2d 627, 220 Ga. 179, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1964
Docket22522
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 137 S.E.2d 627 (Pippin v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pippin v. Sheffield, 137 S.E.2d 627, 220 Ga. 179, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 481 (Ga. 1964).

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

We review here a judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding discharging the prisoner from the custody of the warden. The prisoner, C. C. Sheffield, filed his petition in the Superior Court of Jefferson County against W. B. Pippin, warden of the Jefferson Prison Branch, alleging that he was being illegally detained by the warden in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and Art. I, Sec. I, Par. V of the State Constitution, in that he was denied counsel at his 1959 arraignment, plea of guilty and sentencing to a term of four years.

Under our view of the case, the validity or invalidity of the 1959 sentence complained of as being null and void cannot be determined in this case. The record shows that the prisoner was being detained under several sentences, the latest of which is the only one attacked here, and the undisputed evidence is that he was not due to be released until 1971. Computations from the sentences and dates appearing in the evidence do not show that he was serving the 1959 sentence complained of. Nor is there any other evidence that at the time of this habeas corpus hearing he was serving such 1959 sentence. Therefore, “since a writ of habeas corpus looks only to the lawfulness of the present confinement, and does not deal with the lawfulness of a possible future imprisonment under another sentence,” Balkcom v. Gaulding, 216 Ga. 410 (116 SE2d 545), this prisoner should not have been released, irrespective of the question of denial of counsel upon the 1959 sentencing.

Accordingly, the judgment ordering the prisoner’s discharge was erroneous.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steed v. Ault
193 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Taylor v. Ault
192 S.E.2d 899 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Bridges v. Ault
189 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Chaffin v. Stynchcombe
186 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Pattillo v. Caldwell
186 S.E.2d 866 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Dutton v. Knight
153 S.E.2d 714 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Cobb v. Dutton
148 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
McCall v. State
145 S.E.2d 419 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1965)
Balkcom v. Hurst
139 S.E.2d 306 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Balkcom v. Craton
138 S.E.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E.2d 627, 220 Ga. 179, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pippin-v-sheffield-ga-1964.