Pippin v. Davis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Pippin v. Davis

84 So. 2d 424, 226 Miss. 424, 1956 Miss. LEXIS 414

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 1956·No. No. 39858·Published

Opinion

Hall,, J.

This suit involves the location of the dividing line between a forty acre subdivision owned by appel[426]*426lant and a forty acre subdivision owned by appellee. There was a long and tedious hearing before the chancellor and the evidence was sharply in conflict. The chancellor saw and heard the numerous witnesses and accepted the evidence of those for appellee. He was abundantly supported by the evidence and we cannot say that he was manifestly wrong or that his finding is contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Consequently his decree must be and it is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C. J., and Kyle, Holmes and Gillespie, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall,, J.

This suit involves the location of the dividing line between a forty acre subdivision owned by appel[426]*426lant and a forty acre subdivision owned by appellee. There was a long and tedious hearing before the chancellor and the evidence was sharply in conflict. The chancellor saw and heard the numerous witnesses and accepted the evidence of those for appellee. He was abundantly supported by the evidence and we cannot say that he was manifestly wrong or that his finding is contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Consequently his decree must be and it is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C. J., and Kyle, Holmes and Gillespie, JJ., concur.

Pippin v. Davis, 84 So. 2d 424, 226 Miss. 424, 1956 Miss. LEXIS 414 (Mich. 1956).

Pincite

84 So. 2d 424 (Pippin v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.