Pippillion v. State

186 S.W.3d 694, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2727, 2006 WL 870924
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 5, 2006·No. 10-04-00264-CR·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s court appointed attorney filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

As an exception to this Court’s order in Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907-08 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, order), this Court may grant a motion to withdraw when appointed counsel files an Anders brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); see also Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). Therefore, appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

New counsel has appeared and has filed a brief on Appellant’s behalf. The case will be submitted in due course for consideration by the Court.

Justice VANCE, concurring with a note. *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pippillion v. State, 186 S.W.3d 694, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2727, 2006 WL 870924 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

186 S.W.3d 694 (Pippillion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ibarra v. State
226 S.W.3d 481 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Rolando Ibarra v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006