Pipkin v. . Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Pipkin v. . Green

14 S.E. 966, 110 N.C. 462

DecidedFebruary 5, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.E. 966 (Pipkin v. . Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pipkin v. . Green, 14 S.E. 966, 110 N.C. 462 (N.C. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case was tried at November Term, 1890. It should have stood for argument here at Spring Term, 1891. In August, 1891, the appellant agreed to take no advantage of appellee’s delay till then to serve a counter-case. But this did not release appellant from the duty of docketing case here at Fall Term, 1891. The case, however, was not docketed till February Term, 1892; nor is it printed. The motion to dismiss should be allowed. In re Berry, 107 N. C., 326; Hinton v. Pritchard, 108 N. C., 412; Johnston v. Whitehead, 109 N. C., 207.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This case was tried at November Term, 1890. It should have stood for argument here at Spring Term, 1891. In August, 1891, the appellant agreed to take no advantage of appellee’s delay till then to serve a counter-case. But this did not release appellant from the duty of docketing case here at Fall Term, 1891. The case, however, was not docketed till February Term, 1892; nor is it printed. The motion to dismiss should be allowed. In re Berry, 107 N. C., 326; Hinton v. Pritchard, 108 N. C., 412; Johnston v. Whitehead, 109 N. C., 207.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 S.E. 966, 110 N.C. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pipkin-v-green-nc-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack