Pipkin v. . Green

14 S.E. 966, 110 N.C. 462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pipkin v. . Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 N.C. 355
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case was tried at November Term, 1890. It should have stood for argument here at Spring Term, 1891. In August, 1891, the appellant agreed to take no advantage of appellee’s delay till then to serve a counter-case. But this did not release appellant from the duty of docketing case here at Fall Term, 1891. The case, however, was not docketed till February Term, 1892; nor is it printed. The motion to dismiss should be allowed. In re Berry, 107 N. C., 326; Hinton v. Pritchard, 108 N. C., 412; Johnston v. Whitehead, 109 N. C., 207.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pipkin v. . Green, 14 S.E. 966, 110 N.C. 462 (N.C. 1892).

14 S.E. 966 (Pipkin v. . Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Berry
12 S.E. 125 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Hinton v. . Pritchard
12 S.E. 838 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Johnston v. . Whitehead
13 S.E. 731 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)