Pipes v. McBride
This text of Pipes v. McBride (Pipes v. McBride) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8094
JAMES FRANKLIN PIPES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:05-cv-00058-REM-JSK)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Franklin Pipes, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Deputy Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Franklin Pipes appeals the district court’s
order adopting in part, vacating in part, and remanding for
further consideration the magistrate judge’s recommendation to
dismiss Pipes’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought
under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Pipes seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pipes v. McBride, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pipes-v-mcbride-ca4-2008.