Piper v. Wilson

Fourth Circuit

Piper v. Wilson

667 F. App'x 429

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2016·No. No. 16-6346·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Piper, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting [430]*430the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Piper v. Wilson, No. 2:15-cv-00154-AWA-LRL, 2016 WL 324983 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Piper, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting [430]*430the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Piper v. Wilson, No. 2:15-cv-00154-AWA-LRL, 2016 WL 324983 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Piper v. Wilson, 667 F. App'x 429 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 429 (Piper v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related