Piper v. Thompson
34 Kan. 62
This text of 34 Kan. 62 (Piper v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Piper v. Thompson, 34 Kan. 62 (kan 1885).
Opinion
This case is before us solely upon a bill of exceptions. There is no case-made, and no certified transcript. The certificate to the record is as follows:
“The State of Kansas, Twelfth Judicial District, Marshall County, ss. : I, Joseph M. Patterson, clerk of the district court of the twelfth judicial district of the state of Kansas, sitting within and for the county aforesaid, and custodian of the records thereof, hereby certify the above and foregoing to be a true, full and complete copy of bill of exceptions in cause wherein E. D. Thompson, et al., are plaintiffs, and A. J. Piper and Helen E. Piper are defendants in the therein-entitled cause, as the same remains on file in my office.
"Witness my hand, and the seal of said court affixed at my office in Marysville, this the 4th day of April, 1885.
[Seal.] George Thomas,
Clerk of District Court.
By N B. Carden, Deputy.”
Within the authority of Whitney v. Harris, 21 Kas. 96, and Shumaker v. O’Brien, 19 id. 476, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Whitney v. Harris
21 Kan. 96 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Kan. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piper-v-thompson-kan-1885.