Piper v. State
This text of 520 So. 2d 320 (Piper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Carl Guy Piper, challenges the trial court’s assessment of $846.25 in court costs in the written judgment and sentence where the trial judge failed to notify him at sentencing that such costs would be imposed. The only costs announced at sentencing were $50 for public defender services and $20 for the crime victim fund. We therefore strike all costs other than the $70, without prejudice to the state seeking reassessment upon proper notice to the defendant. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Sescon v. State, 506 So.2d 45 (Fla.2d DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 So. 2d 320, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 666, 1988 WL 13715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piper-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.