Piper v. Landstreet

Supreme Court of Florida

Piper v. Landstreet

143 So. 612, 106 Fla. 688

DecidedSeptember 21, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 612 (Piper v. Landstreet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piper v. Landstreet, 143 So. 612, 106 Fla. 688 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Arthur F. Landstreet as plaintiff below brought a common law action against Henry D. Piper laying his damages in the sum of $30,000. Pursuant to a welter of pleading a trial was had resulting in a verdict and judgment for $8,800 with interest. This writ of error was prosecuted to that judgment.

Many errors are assigned and argued in this court. To treat all of them would require a lengthy opinion which we cannot see would serve any useful purpose. The record and briefs have been examined carefully and while it appears that some of the assignments were well grounded, such error as they constitute was technical and harmless for which reversal does not lie. Section 2812 Revised General Statutes of 1920 (Section 4499 Compiled General Laws of 1927).

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Arthur F. Landstreet as plaintiff below brought a common law action against Henry D. Piper laying his damages in the sum of $30,000. Pursuant to a welter of pleading a trial was had resulting in a verdict and judgment for $8,800 with interest. This writ of error was prosecuted to that judgment.

Many errors are assigned and argued in this court. To treat all of them would require a lengthy opinion which we cannot see would serve any useful purpose. The record and briefs have been examined carefully and while it appears that some of the assignments were well grounded, such error as they constitute was technical and harmless for which reversal does not lie. Section 2812 Revised General Statutes of 1920 (Section 4499 Compiled General Laws of 1927).

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 So. 612, 106 Fla. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piper-v-landstreet-fla-1932.