Piper v. Elwood

4 Denio 165
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1847·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

The defendant defeated the effect of the levy and sale, by suing for and recovering the value of the property. The first judgment thereupon revived, and might be enforced. If the judgment had been in a court of record, the plaintiff would have been allowed to amend or strike out the return on the execution, and to have a new execution. (Adams v. Smith, 5 Cowen, 280.) As the justice had no power to order such an amendment, an action on the judg ment was the appropriate remedy.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piper v. Elwood, 4 Denio 165 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

4 Denio 165 (Piper v. Elwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. v. Fitzpatrick
35 Misc. 456 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
Ames Iron Works v. Kalamazoo Pulley Co.
37 S.W. 409 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)
Wallace v. Berdell
1 N.Y. St. Rep. 564 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Weaver v. Guyer
59 Ind. 195 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Sargent v. Sturm
23 Cal. 359 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Biscoe v. Sandefur
14 Ark. 568 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1854)
Ross v. Hicks
11 Barb. 481 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Harris v. Palmer
5 Barb. 105 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)