Piper v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Piper v. Coughlin

99 A.D.2d 511, 471 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 511 (Piper v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piper v. Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 511, 471 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

[512]*512— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services affirming a decision of the Medical Review Board of the New York State Commission of Correction denying the petitioner, an inmate of Greenhaven Correctional Facility, permission to purchase and possess a “mustache finishing clipper”, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated October 20,1982, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We hold that there are other adequate means and facilities available to resolve petitioner’s problems. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[512]*512— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services affirming a decision of the Medical Review Board of the New York State Commission of Correction denying the petitioner, an inmate of Greenhaven Correctional Facility, permission to purchase and possess a “mustache finishing clipper”, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated October 20,1982, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We hold that there are other adequate means and facilities available to resolve petitioner’s problems. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 511, 471 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piper-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack