Pipeline Systems, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Pounds)

133 A.3d 291, 635 Pa. 192, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 403, 2016 WL 886673
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 8, 2016·No. 384 WAL 2015 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

*193 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) [Did t]he Commonwealth Court err[] because [§ 601(a)(10), 77 P.S. § 1031] unambiguously provides that the employee must be within the course and scope of his employment at the time he provides aid and is injured, not merely be in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the emergency arose as the Commonwealth Court held[?]
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pipeline Systems, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Pounds), 133 A.3d 291, 635 Pa. 192, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 403, 2016 WL 886673 (Pa. 2016).

133 A.3d 291 (Pipeline Systems, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Pounds)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.